Page 17 - DIGIGREEN_PR2_EN
P. 17

of the participants believed that Hybrid, online and face to face combined lectures are the best
                  learning method, in terms of type of lesson” .
                                                         7
                  Online delivery option gives the opportunity to be more flexible in what it comes place and time
                  dedicated to the learning activity.

                  However, this topic is not consensual for all the players. Training institutions usually prefer to
                  deliver  the  micro  credentials  in  a  classroom-based  learning  environment,  while  companies
                  choose the blended or even online learning (Cedefop 2022).

                  When it comes to the duration of the micro credential, the length of a learning experience varies
                  significantly, and depending on the provider and its purpose. When the learning activity is very
                  specific and narrow, with restricted skills and competences the duration of it is shorter, when
                  compared to other general qualifications.

                  Regarding assessment, and according to Cedefop (2022), this is a crucial topic in any learning
                  process, since it can reflect the quality and the trust in credentials. For this, micro credentials can
                  use different assessments methods, and the evidence are usually based on the attendance of
                  learners,  but  mostly  assignments  that  can  better  reflect  the  acquired  knowledge.  Finally,
                  assessments are usually made in-house and undertaken by external/independent providers.





                  3.5  Micro credentials and the allocation of credits


                  The European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) is identified as one of the solutions
                  to support the approach to credits in micro credentials. ECTS is a recognised mechanism to make
                  the learning outcomes (LO) and estimate the workload and duration of a course as something
                  measurable. It brings  transparency  to  micro  credentials  and,  apart  from  being a  harmonised
                  mechanism is also used and recognised all over Europe.

                  Besides ECTS being close to higher education, the European Commission (2020) expect that it can
                  be expanded to other levels.

                  Another benefit of micro credentials using ECTS, is to facilitate the national and international
                  recognition of short courses as independent modules or potential parts of a qualification.
                  According  to  the  NESET  Report  (Orr, 2020),  the flexibility  of  micro  credentials  stands by  the
                  possibility of micro credentials can be both credit-bearing and non-credit bearing. This will lead
                  the students the possibility to choose and adapt their pathway according to their preferences or
                  needs. Important to highlight is the fact that it is expected that the level of complexity and the
                  autonomy required should be present in the micro credential according to this distinguish.
                  The definition of credits for micro credential framework is not consensual at the time (European
                  Commission 2020), there are considerations that

                         “suggest that micro credentials should be based on a notional workload of 100-150 hours
                         (including revision for, and completion of, the summative assessment). This equals 4-6



                  7  PR1 Report, page 19



            Copyright © by Digigreen All Rights Reserved | Training and Assessment Frame Design         17
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22